606 Hockey League
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.

No realignment for youuuuu

+3
Paddywan
J-Iggy
Jonzee
7 posters

Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty No realignment for youuuuu

Post by Jonzee Sat Jan 07, 2012 12:24 pm

Clickety

I wonder on what grounds the NHLPA is opposing it?
Jonzee
Jonzee

Posts : 1253
Join date : 2010-03-20
Age : 39
Location : Nottingham

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by J-Iggy Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:06 am

This is not a good sign for any future CBA.

I wouldn't be suprised if the uneven confrences is the problem.
J-Iggy
J-Iggy

Posts : 1267
Join date : 2010-04-01
Age : 37
Location : Brighton

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by Paddywan Sun Jan 08, 2012 3:20 am

It's definitely not a good sign. Still looking at Puck Daddy's entry on it and Daly's recent video comments they actually scrapped this idea to prevent a war with the NHLPA now. Looking at that article the league was completely taking the piss with the realignment negotiations. I didn't know or even realise the players would need / want an input into it but clearly they have a huge interest in the realignment. The fact that the league not only didn't invite them to join in but refused to listen to their concerns shows who is really at fault.
Paddywan
Paddywan

Posts : 406
Join date : 2010-04-17
Age : 34
Location : Nottingham / (Formerly) Newcastle, N.I.

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by ronnie pander Sun Jan 08, 2012 6:19 am

The NHL need to find their own Maggie Thatcher...
ronnie pander
ronnie pander

Posts : 929
Join date : 2010-03-20
Location : An MhĂ­

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by BuffonIdol Sun Jan 08, 2012 9:58 pm

ronnie pander wrote:The NHL need to find their own Maggie Thatcher...

Meryl Streep?
BuffonIdol
BuffonIdol

Posts : 2386
Join date : 2010-03-20
Age : 36
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by Azzy Luongo Sun Jan 08, 2012 10:05 pm

What I don't get is why the NHLPA has ANY say whatsoever - why do they, and why should they? They're a representative of the players, not a governing body, and the NHL should be able to re-alignas it sees fit.

I'm just gutted about the lost games vs the Sharks /(
Azzy Luongo
Azzy Luongo

Posts : 888
Join date : 2010-03-20
Age : 42

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by Jonzee Mon Jan 09, 2012 2:28 am

The NHL could just realign, but then the NHLPA would tell their players that if they didn't like it to stike. It would be quite hard to play an NHL game with 2-3 men on a side.
Jonzee
Jonzee

Posts : 1253
Join date : 2010-03-20
Age : 39
Location : Nottingham

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by Paddywan Mon Jan 09, 2012 3:02 am

Azzy Luongo wrote:What I don't get is why the NHLPA has ANY say whatsoever - why do they, and why should they? They're a representative of the players, not a governing body, and the NHL should be able to re-alignas it sees fit.

I'm just gutted about the lost games vs the Sharks /(

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/nhl-puck-daddy/why-nhlpa-rejected-nhl-2012-13-realignment-plan-014526165.html
That would be why.
Paddywan
Paddywan

Posts : 406
Join date : 2010-04-17
Age : 34
Location : Nottingham / (Formerly) Newcastle, N.I.

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by BuffonIdol Wed Jan 11, 2012 12:53 am

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=384655

Fehr finally says something, nothing new though except that this isn't going not affect the CBA negotiations Suspect
BuffonIdol
BuffonIdol

Posts : 2386
Join date : 2010-03-20
Age : 36
Location : UK

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by mc_homer Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:01 am

BuffonIdol wrote:this isn't going not affect the CBA negotiations

Does this mean it is? Shocked
mc_homer
mc_homer
Admin

Posts : 5390
Join date : 2010-03-19
Age : 39
Location : Stevenage

https://606hl.forumotion.co.uk

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by Paddywan Wed Jan 11, 2012 1:09 am

Tinfoil hat time. the nhlpa couldnt actually block it just not give consent. Some have suggested the league killed it becausr they didnt want it in the first place. It wasnt mr bettmans idea it came from the board.
Paddywan
Paddywan

Posts : 406
Join date : 2010-04-17
Age : 34
Location : Nottingham / (Formerly) Newcastle, N.I.

Back to top Go down

No realignment for youuuuu Empty Re: No realignment for youuuuu

Post by Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Back to top

- Similar topics

 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum